This analysis is free, but with Premium Membership you get MORE. Join today.
UPDATE: I got a LOT of feedback on this essay. Here is my response, and I think it’s very much worth your while. — RDM
by Eva Fu
August 11, 2026
As small towns across the United States reckon with power-hungry data centers springing up, the Chinese Communist Party is muddying the waters and sowing division.
By tapping into the tensions around water usage, power demands, and environmental costs, the regime is trying to widen the wedge using an old playbook: influence peddling and propaganda.
There’s no discounting the groundswell of anger in American towns about data centers in their neighborhoods. Local resistance has blocked or delayed at least 75 data center projects, worth some $130 billion, in the first quarter of 2026 alone, according to Data Center Watch.
Hillsdale College’s wonderful “The Story of America” series is now FREE for you to watch! Learn about the most important episodes in America’s Founding.
Click here for the full series!
But while analysts caution against categorically dismissing all opposition against data centers as Beijing’s work, they say the regime meddling behind the scenes is nonetheless serious — and growing.
Whether it’s energy or water, each is “definitely a real issue,” according to Cleo Paskal, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “But it’s also a real issue that the Chinese Communist Party is perfectly happy to exacerbate to create even more division with the goal not of leading to any solution, but of paralyzing the United States,” she said.
‘Data Center Bandwagon’
Part of the regime’s effort is about harnessing U.S. artificial intelligence against itself.
Using virtual private networks, or VPNs, Chinese operators tapped into ChatGPT, which is not accessible in China. They instructed the chatbot to create English-language comic strips and comments that suggested AI center construction was hiking up electricity costs for average American households.
One comic features a family of three saying “This is unfair!” while glaring at a man in a suit puffing a cigar and clutching bags full of cash, a June OpenAI report found. A set of likely fake accounts then amplified such materials on social media.
OpenAI dubbed the effort the “Data Center Bandwagon campaign.”
Chinese influence operators are “testing narratives against AI infrastructure — a foundation of U.S. technological leadership, economic growth, and the broader democratic AI ecosystem,” the company said in its report.
Keeping an edge on AI has been imperative for the Chinese regime. Its 15th five-year plan, adopted in March, pushes to integrate AI in all sectors of the economy. In a speech on July 17, Chinese leader Xi Jinping laid out another global AI order, in which China will take the lead in training and collaborating on the technology for developing countries.
Chinese authorities see AI as a “battle,” said retired U.S. Marine Col. Grant Newsham, who authored the book When China Attacks to warn about the Chinese regime’s gray zone tactics.
“They want to win it, and they want to defeat us,” Newsham said. And defeating means ensuring the United States falls behind them, and ideally, is dependent on them, he said.
Newsham pointed to green energy as a case study.
The world’s shift to clean energy has led to heavy dependence on China, which produces around 80 percent of the world’s solar modules and batteries and 70 percent of wind turbine equipment. The refining process for several key electric vehicle batteries largely takes place in China.
Now, the Chinese regime wants to achieve the same thing with AI, Newsham said.
Chinese actors appear to still be experimenting at the moment with their fake social media accounts, but analysts and OpenAI warn that they are getting better.
Beijing is not looking for quick results, said Scott McGregor, a former intelligence adviser to Canadian federal law enforcement. “It’s very incremental,” he said.
Volume matters, and AI is enabling Chinese influence campaigns at scale, said Nicolas Chaillan, a cybersecurity expert and former Air Force chief software officer. “If you become the noise and you have the volume with you, then you can control the narrative, and then you can really push your thoughts into people’s minds,” he said. “The more volume it has, the more it’s repeated, the more people are going to believe it.”
Sowing Discord
Running alongside the covert cyber operations is a more overt propaganda push.
In recent months, Chinese state media have carried dozens of articles — in English and Chinese — taunting U.S. buildout roadblocks while boasting China’s successful AI expansion. Many of them echo the same talking points as the fake social media accounts.
This pattern appears to have caught the attention of Washington. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, at a May policy event, said that some of the activism against data centers is driven by “foreign source dark money coming in.”
“It’s not organic or local,” he said.
Several Republican lawmakers have pointed to a network funded by Neville Roy Singham, an American businessman living in Shanghai who has parroted Beijing’s talking points. Singham is now under federal grand jury investigation over potential unlawful money funneling.
The groups linked to him have gained congressional scrutiny previously for fueling protests in the country. Several have openly defended Beijing’s strategic interests, denouncing the United States on Chinese state media and organizing courses that praise Chinese socialism.
Their role in mobilizing anti-data center protests is a chief focus of Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.).
“China would like to dominate the future of artificial intelligence, and it is clear that they are actively seeking to exploit Americans’ legitimate concerns and sow discord in our own backyard for one purpose, and that is to seize this technological advantage for themselves,” Smith, who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a June congressional hearing on Chinese influence.
He vowed to “follow the money and get to the bottom of the dark web of funding sources.”
In late July, Smith subpoenaed three Singham-associated nonprofits, citing tens of millions of dollars funneled through Singham.
Some of the opposition voices said their core issue is a lack of transparency from the government. Residents “want to feel heard in decisions that will impact their lives for decades to come,” Elizabeth Hutchings, communications manager of Alliance for a Better Utah, said. The group has fought a major data center project in the state and denies any foreign hand in its work.
Lawmakers and experts say true community-led opposition and the Chinese influence campaigns are two distinct issues. “There’s a place for legitimate concerns about data centers and AI, but let’s have that debate separate from the malign influence by the Chinese Communist Party,” David Shedd, former acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said.
The Chinese regime, he said, has “every vested interest” in sowing discord.
McGregor agreed, saying the regime is trying to catch up on AI, and it will want to slow the United States down in any way it can.
Singham couldn’t be reached for comment.
‘Tell Half a Story’
Exploiting friction points in open societies is a familiar tactic for the Chinese regime.
When the United States grappled with anti-Asian hate crimes in 2021, Beijing saw an opportunity to divert attention away from human rights abuses in its own country. Its diplomats and state media accused the United States of hypocrisy and boasted that the Chinese version of governance was better.
“They tell half a story, or they change the story enough so that it corrodes the truth,” Stephen Nagy, a professor of politics and international studies at Tokyo’s International Christian University, said. “These are patterns that are only accentuated and put on steroids with AI.”
Ethan Tu’s Taiwan AI Labs has used AI to track coordinated influence operations. In most cases, he said, the operators aim to wear down public trust and push both sides to the extreme until there’s no room for objective conversation.
When democratic functions become paralyzed, people might think, “democracy is really chaos, it’s no better than China,” he said.
In the case of AI, the regime is running the campaign on top of a litany of efforts to gain the coveted AI edge. Where the technology has fallen short, it makes up the difference by stealing American tradecraft, smuggling chips through third countries, and leveraging supply chain dependencies to impede U.S. AI infrastructure growth.
Beijing — by far the most capable competitor in this space — is running a “multifaceted, national-level strategy” to displace the United States as the world’s most influential AI power, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said in a 2025 report.
A number of lawmakers said they were concerned.
Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the United States is “absolutely dealing with Chinese influence” on the AI front.
“At a local level in the United States of America, we’re not run by Washington, D.C. Each community gets to go out there and make their own decision about what they see as fits well within their communities,” he said. “That’s our system of governance at the lowest possible level. But yes, we are absolutely dealing with Chinese influence on that front, because it benefits them for us to not have compute.”
Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), like Smith, backed the grand jury investigation of Singham. He said the regime doesn’t “belong anywhere in our American political debates.”
These are “important local political debates that often involve local and state laws and policies, and the Chinese shouldn’t meddle in those debates,” he said. “So we should crack down on them for it, and be fully aware of their motivations.”
If China achieves its goal, the threat to the United States and other democracies will be “existential,” said Kerry Gershaneck, a National Chengchi University professor who has closely studied Chinese political warfare operations.
The Chinese communist rulers are “already far ahead of any other country in weaponizing AI,” he told The Epoch Times. Combine that with a “massive global data-collection ecosystem,” he said, and the regime would have the ultimate tool to export its totalitarian model and “destroy us from within.”
— This analysis is published in cooperation with The Epoch Times.
It's all a dilemma (IMO).
The PRC/CPP presents an existential threat, both to the U.S. and Western Civilization writ large.
At the same time, so does Globalism (central banks, WEF, U.N. and whoever and whatever all are behind those behind the curtain). [In the end, though, both the CCP and Globalism are, at root, Satanic.]
I've long been convinced that the CCP and Globalists (and Muslim Brotherhood) have aligned to take-out the U.S., as a prerequisite for global domination - hence my term "The Globalist-CCP Axis."
So, while we have to compete (and beat) the CCP with all forms of tech, I fear that we are simultaneously erecting the tech panopticon of AI, CBDC, Flock cameras and all the rest that could, ultimately (if not inevitably) provide the <ahem> "genesis" for executing The Mark of the Beast.