The Comey "grand conspiracy" subpoena is not isolated. It is part of a sprawling investigation that has already issued more than 130 subpoenas in the last few months.
I’m happy to see this and I was tempted to send this out to my various chat groups who don’t read your Substack or some of the other ones that I read. However, until we start seeing actual prosecutions trials and convictions, then to me, this is just background and what we like to call hopium.
I disagree. 130 subpoenas, and why? Because building a "grand conspiracy" case requires scale, a tremendous amount of evidence gathering, and time. However, if it can be established to the satisfaction of a grand jury, this approach to the case (1) eliminates the statute of limitations problem that would otherwise let most of these guys walk (which may have been the main reason for the election theft in 2020: to run out the SOL), and (2) moves venue out of D.C. (where we cannot get fair trials) to South Florida (where we at least have a shot).
This is a major development, and let me circle back to those 130 subpoenas: you tend to call the major targets after you've already built your case against them with the little fish.
Thank you for the response. I agree that it’s significant news and I love the Grand Conspiracy approach. I just feel that skeptics aren’t going to get on board until we get actual convictions, and sharing this good news doesn’t help as much as I’d like to think it would.
People have ceased hoping that anything can get better. But we must resist the black pill. Nothing good comes apart from consistent action. And the left is far better at consistent action than our team ever was.
Oh my, great article by Mr. Stone. Thank you for sharing this. It is so good to read updates like this. It makes one feel that maybe, just maybe, those that did wrong and grossly abused their power may pay for that misconduct. Understanding it may not lead to substantial accountability, it might, and I greatly appreciate the hurculean efforts to untangle this massive web of conspiracy, what did Strzok, call it? "A backup plan" or something to that effect?
I’m happy to see this and I was tempted to send this out to my various chat groups who don’t read your Substack or some of the other ones that I read. However, until we start seeing actual prosecutions trials and convictions, then to me, this is just background and what we like to call hopium.
I disagree. 130 subpoenas, and why? Because building a "grand conspiracy" case requires scale, a tremendous amount of evidence gathering, and time. However, if it can be established to the satisfaction of a grand jury, this approach to the case (1) eliminates the statute of limitations problem that would otherwise let most of these guys walk (which may have been the main reason for the election theft in 2020: to run out the SOL), and (2) moves venue out of D.C. (where we cannot get fair trials) to South Florida (where we at least have a shot).
This is a major development, and let me circle back to those 130 subpoenas: you tend to call the major targets after you've already built your case against them with the little fish.
Thank you for the response. I agree that it’s significant news and I love the Grand Conspiracy approach. I just feel that skeptics aren’t going to get on board until we get actual convictions, and sharing this good news doesn’t help as much as I’d like to think it would.
People have ceased hoping that anything can get better. But we must resist the black pill. Nothing good comes apart from consistent action. And the left is far better at consistent action than our team ever was.
Oh my, great article by Mr. Stone. Thank you for sharing this. It is so good to read updates like this. It makes one feel that maybe, just maybe, those that did wrong and grossly abused their power may pay for that misconduct. Understanding it may not lead to substantial accountability, it might, and I greatly appreciate the hurculean efforts to untangle this massive web of conspiracy, what did Strzok, call it? "A backup plan" or something to that effect?