Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Wigand's avatar

>>"Now, men fear leadership will make them villains. They think initiative is domineering, protection is patronizing, and provision is irrelevant. They’ve been discipled to retreat, not advance. And in their retreat, homes weaken, churches lose warriors, and a generation of boys grows up never seeing manhood done right."

Leaving aside the beta-by-choice males (e.g., "Progressives") who genuflect in things like "I'm a feminist too" ...

Methinks a lot of the dynamic is (also) "learned helplessness."

For decades now men have been perpetual punching bags in "family court"; passed-over for hiring and promotions in favor of "DEI hires"; had their blue-collar jobs shipped to near-slave labor domiciles like China and, e.g., subject to summary career immolation at any mere allegation of "harassment."

Relatedly, workplaces for decades now have focused on "teams" - this actually serving to make them more female-friendly than male competitiveness friendly (at the behest of "feminists" to make workplaces feel "more inclusive").

ALL OF THIS IMPOSED, BACKED BY THE COMPULSORY FORCE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM.

Today's young men have grown up with this, knowing nothing else.

Intuitively, this system goes against mens' nature. But the "learned helplessness," especially in the younger generation(s), is arguably a rational reaction to to a system they feel they can't change, so instead they just "check out."

All that said, perhaps the tide is beginning to turn. Recent article (by women) bemoan the fact that men aren't interested in dating them (etc.). Perhaps the (increasingly shared) misery caused by feminism will provide the catalyst for a societal return toward a more natural order.

Expand full comment

No posts