EXTRA: What You Need to Know About the Insurrection Act of 1807
The last use of the legislation was in 1992, when President George H. W. Bush invoked it to send troops to Los Angeles to put down the Rodney King riots.
Don’t miss the FREE second excerpt from my new book, Essays on the Counterrevolution. The book is FREE too for Premium & Founding Members!
This essay is free, but with Premium Membership you get MORE. Join today.
by Stacy Robinson and Joseph Lord
June 10, 2025
As protests against federal immigration enforcement turned into violent riots across Los Angeles over the weekend, questions have arisen about whether President Donald Trump will invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807, and send active duty U.S. military members to quell the violence and vandalism.
The law allows the president to deploy the National Guard or other U.S. military personnel to put down an uprising that interferes with the rights of the populace if “the constituted authorities of that state are unable, fail, or refuse” to do so.
Here’s what you need to know.
The Insurrection Act
The law has its origin in the 1792 legislation that allowed the federal government to call up state militias “to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions.”
The 1807 Insurrection Act added additional powers for the president, including the ability to deploy active duty federal troops without the request or support of state government actors.
It provides some of the only exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 law that generally forbids the use of the military against American citizens.
Those exceptions include suppressing insurrections, enforcing federal authority, and protecting civil rights when state authorities fail to act.
Nevertheless, federal troops and guardsmen can be deployed in certain circumstances even without the invocation of the act.
In such cases, they are permitted to protect federal personnel and property, but cannot make arrests or perform other law enforcement activities unless the president invokes insurrection law.
Although he has not yet officially invoked the act, on June 7, President Trump announced he had authorized 2,000 National Guard troops for deployment to Los Angeles to quell the riots, despite objections by California’s Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom. The Pentagon on June 9 confirmed that 700 U.S. Marines were deploying from Camp Pendleton to Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and personnel.
History
[NOTE: Pay attention and you’ll see the one common denominator in every one of these: after 1792, all the insurrectionists have always been Democrats. — RDM]
The legislation has been used numerous times in U.S. history.
President George Washington called up state militias under the 1792 law to suppress the Whiskey Rebellion, an uprising against federal excise taxes on liquor.
It was later used by President Abraham Lincoln at the outset of the Civil War, and afterwards by President Ulysses S. Grant against the Ku Klux Klan.
Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy invoked it during desegregation disputes in the South.
President Lyndon Johnson invoked the act — against the wishes of a governor — when he deployed troops to Alabama to ensure order during civil rights protests in 1965.
The last use of the legislation was in 1992, when President George H. W. Bush invoked it to send troops to Los Angeles to put down riots when four police officers were acquitted after the beating of Rodney King.
Following the 2020 death of George Floyd in police custody, riots broke out across the United States during the summer that resulted in billions of dollars in damage to cities including Minneapolis and Seattle.
Use of the Insurrection Act to suppress these riots was considered, but Trump ultimately declined to invoke the law.
At the outset of his second term as president, Trump signed an executive order requiring the secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to submit a report within 90 days on the illegal immigration crisis at the southern border, and advise whether it justified the use of the 1807 Insurrection Act.
California Hits Back
On June 9, Newsom also announced that the state is suing the Trump administration over its decision to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles.
Newsom called Trump’s move “a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they’re actually needed.”
Hours later, California Attorney General Rob Bonta on Monday announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration for deploying the National Guard.
Bonta called the deployment an “unlawful action.”
“We only bring cases we believe we will win based on the law and the facts and our analysis,” he added. “We wouldn’t bring this one if we weren’t confident of our success.”
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass blamed ICE operations arresting illegal immigrants for stoking the riots in her city.
“We do not know where and when the next raids will be. That is the concern because people in this city have a rapid response network,” she told CNN on Monday.
“If they see ICE, they go out, and they protest, and so it’s just a recipe for pandemonium that is completely unnecessary,” she continued.
In other words, the Democrat mayor is saying that since local Democrats are organized to obstruct justice, there should be no law enforcement!
Will Trump Invoke the Insurrection Act?
Federal law allows the president to call guardsmen into service even in cases where the Insurrection Act has not been invoked.
Under 10 U.S. Code § 12406, the president is permitted to order guardsmen into service — with or without the support of a state governor — in the event of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States,” alongside additional circumstances such as invasion.
On June 9, a White House official confirmed that Marines had been deployed to the city to protect federal personnel and property.
However, without an invocation of the Insurrection Act, their authority is limited solely to protecting federal interests in the region, and they are not authorized to make arrests or carry out general law enforcement functions.
While Trump has not yet invoked the Insurrection Act, the law gives him broad authority to decide whether it’s necessary.
In the 1827 case Martin v. Mott, the Supreme Court ruled that the authority to decide whether an emergency justifies deploying a militia under the Insurrection Act — in this case, the National Guard — “belongs exclusively to the president,” and “his decision is conclusive upon all other persons.”
On June 9, Trump remained ambiguous about his plans regarding the Insurrection Act. When asked if he intends to invoke the act, Trump smiled and continued to walk away without answering.
We shall soon see.
— This essay is published with permission of The Epoch Times.
"When asked if he intends to invoke the act, Trump smiled and continued to walk away without answering. We shall soon see."
Yes but I cannot help but imagine that our 45th / 47th president is also working on something very significant in the background, deliberately away from all this street level "Sturm und Drang." This foolish chaos instigated & sponsored by the too-clever Globalist-funded Democrats (in their own cities!) is the near perfect cover for what I believe is being prepared to be announced on an entirely different topic.
Yet this also provides ICE and the rest of the federal law enforcement apparatus to locate and arrest domestic criminal leftwing agents for prosecution as well as illegal aliens for lawful deportation. It's like netting fish in a barrel...