The Rod Martin Report

The Rod Martin Report

Share this post

The Rod Martin Report
The Rod Martin Report
Biden’s Domestic Terror Plan Was a Blueprint for Censorship and One-Party Rule
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Geopolitics, Tech & Markets

Biden’s Domestic Terror Plan Was a Blueprint for Censorship and One-Party Rule

A party that routinely resorts not to persuasion but to political violence and terror — throughout American history — should not be trusted with power.

Rod D. Martin's avatar
Rod D. Martin
Apr 28, 2025
∙ Paid
20

Share this post

The Rod Martin Report
The Rod Martin Report
Biden’s Domestic Terror Plan Was a Blueprint for Censorship and One-Party Rule
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
3
6
Share

Don’t miss our Deep Dive “The Illusion of Chinese Strength: Power, Paranoia, and the Temptation of War”. It’s one of the most important things we’ve ever published.

The Illusion of Chinese Strength: Power, Paranoia, and the Temptation of War

The Illusion of Chinese Strength: Power, Paranoia, and the Temptation of War

Rod D. Martin
·
Apr 3
Read full story
"Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic." — Joe Biden, Sept. 1, 2022 in Philadelphia, with uniformed troops standing behind him.

by Rod D. Martin
April 28, 2025

Until now, critics of Biden’s domestic terror agenda were dismissed as conspiracy theorists. To their dismay, Americans have learned over the last five years that the difference between a conspiracy theory and an established fact seems to be about six months.

The Biden administration’s so-called “Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism” (SIP), recently declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, exposes the machinery of a censorship regime masquerading as counterterrorism. Its methods didn’t protect liberty — they dismantled it.

Share

We were told that no government would ever target ordinary Americans for their political views. Indeed, that’s the whole point of the First Amendment. But on April 16, 2025, that lie collapsed. The full declassification of Biden’s SIP reveals not a protective shield against violence, but a calculated effort to repurpose national security tools to suppress dissent, particularly from conservatives and Christians.

The question isn’t whether governments should guard against domestic terrorism. Any rational society must deter political violence, which is exactly why Donald Trump is trying to secure the border Biden opened. The real question is whether, under the guise of national security, the ruling party can use the powers of the state to label and punish its peaceful opposition as “terrorists”.

For the last four years under Democrats — they told you they were Socialists now — that line was erased. It was about to get a lot worse.

A Police State Masquerading as “Security”

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Rod D. Martin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More