The People vs. The Bureaucrats
The "Our Democracy" crowd gears up to thwart the outcome of a free election, with nearly half of all Federal employees saying they will "resist" the President and the agenda Americans voted for.
NOTE: As I discussed at greater length in my essay on Monday, the Deep State is very real, and intends to “resist” the elected President at every turn. It believes it has not just the power but the right to rule the rest of us. That may very well be what Democrats mean by “Our Democracy”, but it certainly isn’t “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” For Constitutional government to be restored, President Trump will have to take swift and decisive action, as indeed he did on Monday.
That article is here. It’s had 20 million views so far on X. You should read it. — RDM
The People vs. The Bureaucrats
by Newt Gingrich
January 23, 2025
A recent survey of senior government employees revealed that 42 percent of them plan to work against the incoming Trump administration.
According to Tyler O’Neil, managing editor of the Daily Signal, “A surprising number of federal government employees admit they are gearing up to act like a deep state, opposing the incoming second administration of Donald Trump.”
He cited a poll by RMG Research Survey, which had been commissioned by the Napolitan Institute.
This should not surprise us. Much of the federal bureaucracy was recruited from among Democrats who came to Washington to impose their values and views on the American people. Many of the regulatory agencies consider it their jobs to force the American people to do what bureaucrats proscribe.
President Trump and the Make America Great Again movement are a mortal threat to these bureaucrats. If President Trump does what he said he would do during the campaign, he is going to threaten the lifetime work of many senior federal bureaucrats. Everything they spent years trying to impose on the American people will be wiped out by the Trump administration.
The new Elon Musk Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is an example of the kind of threat President Trump represents for establishment bureaucrats. The DOGE’s goal to cut $2 trillion from government spending will shatter the patterns, habits, procedures, and systems of the bureaucratic Washington establishment.
Imagine you spent 20 or 30 years methodically building a system that would let you achieve your ideological goals – even if the American people opposed you. Then imagine your life’s work is suddenly threatened by outsiders who are businesspeople who thrived outside the typical Washington environment. You would be horrified. For you, the barbarians are at the gate.
This is not a new problem. A senior official in the George W. Bush Defense Department once told me the Pentagon bureaucracy just hunkers down to outlast new administrations. They refer to appointed officials as “the summer help.”
During the first Trump administration, a senior State Department official pointed out to me there are about 27 appointees in the Foreign Service – and 13,000 full-time bureaucrats who oppose them. Like the Paul Newman film “Fort Apache, the Bronx,” he told me “we are in the building, and they are surrounding us.”
This continual problem of bureaucracies manipulating or ignoring elected officials was brilliantly captured in two BBC TV series “Yes, Minister” and “Yes, Prime Minister.” Producer Antony Jay was a senior adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Many of the episodes grew out of actual civil service manipulation against the Prime Minister. She said it was her favorite TV show. Every Trump appointee should watch the series.
President Trump can’t possibly achieve his extraordinary goals if 42 percent of his senior bureaucracy is actively undermining him. Furthermore, bureaucracies that overrule elected officials violate President Abraham Lincoln’s principle, which he articulated at Gettysburg. We want “government of the people, by the people, for the people.”
President Lincoln understood the importance of the elected executive controlling the instruments of government. In a small government (which exploded in size to win the Civil War), Lincoln replaced 1,200 of the 1,500 policy-making bureaucrats.
Since many of the people Lincoln replaced were Southerners, or pro-South, he could not possibly have won the war had they stayed in their positions. Replacing his opponents in the government with supporters was one of the key decisions that enabled the Union to endure four long, bitter years of war and prevail.
President Trump does not have the power (nor would he have the ready replacements) to have an proportionate shift in today’s much larger government.
However, he must have the ability to replace bureaucrats who clearly try to sabotage, slow walk, or undermine his policies.
This is a key principle the American people will accept. Once they have selected a chief executive, that person should be able to execute. If they can’t, the whole system is beyond the control of the American people.
The Constitution has no provision for acceptable bureaucratic tyranny. It provides for the people to rule through elections to the House, Senate, and White House.
Controlling rogue bureaucrats – and passing laws necessary to execute that control – will be a key test for the Trump administration and those who want to Make America Great Again.
This will be one of the first great struggles of the new administration.
— This essay was originally published at Gingrich360.com.
And don’t miss this essay, which has received over 20 million views on X:
 |
|
There's a lot more detail about the inevitable relationship between liberal democracies and large unaccountable bureaucracies in Auron MacIntyre's "The Total State"
If Auron is correct, then even if you reduce or reform the bureaucracy, it will eventually return unless intentional mechanisms are established to prevent that.
Our REPUBLIC perceivers !