The Rod Martin Report

The Rod Martin Report

Share this post

The Rod Martin Report
The Rod Martin Report
Isolationism vs. Internationalism: False Choices
Geopolitics, Tech & Markets

Isolationism vs. Internationalism: False Choices

America has no true isolationists. The debate is actually between two opposing internationalist strategies.

Guest Author
May 10, 2016
∙ Paid

Share this post

The Rod Martin Report
The Rod Martin Report
Isolationism vs. Internationalism: False Choices
Share

by George Friedman
May 10, 2016

Since World War I, US policy has been split between isolationism and internationalism. From debates over joining the League of Nations to intervention in Europe, Americans have found odd comfort in siding with one of these two camps.

The isolationists wanted to avoid being mired in foreign intrigues, wars, and crises. The internationalists argued that without involvement, the world would evolve in ways that lacked US influence and thus threatened its national security. On December 7, 1941, the internationalists won the debate.

The problem was that the friction was not between true isolationists and internationalists. The fact was, there were no genuine isolationists. The debate was actually between two internationalist strategies. The clash between these two camps has been ongoing since the founding of the United States. It is an issue that is simmering towards a boil again today.

During the 1930s, this debate centered on the best way to handle Europe. One s…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
A guest post by
Guest Author
© 2025 Rod D. Martin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share